Modern Arbitration: LIVE. Discussion on arbitration in a comparative perspective. The Role of Procedural Soft Law in International Arbitration
![Diego Brian Gosis](/storage/expert_image/ex9-hover — копия (1)_1678112614.jpg)
Diego Brian Gosis
Partner, GST LLP
![Andrey Gorlenko](/templates/v2/img/ex1.jpg)
Andrey Gorlenko
Executive Administrator, Russian Arbitration Center
![Sergey Alekhin](/storage/expert_image/Алехин С (1).png)
Sergey Alekhin
Counsel, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
![Nikita Kondrashov](/templates/v2/img/ex1.jpg)
Nikita Kondrashov
Associate, Luther Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH
![Olga Tsvetkova](/templates/v2/img/ex5.jpg)
Olga Tsvetkova
Attorney, Senior Associate, EPAM
![Artem Doudko](/templates/v2/img/ex1.jpg)
Artem Doudko
Partner, Osborne Clarke
![](https://img.youtube.com/vi/mcKL4wQbzm8/0.jpg)
Video
- How the IBA soft law instruments are perceived in practice, in particular: IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest, IBA Rules on Taking Evidence, IBA Guidelines on Party Representation?
- What is the approach of common law and civil law practitioners to the IBA soft law instruments?
- What are the potential amendments to the existing IBA soft law instruments?
- Are there any new soft law instruments under consideration among the arbitration community?
- Is there a need for an alternative to soft law instruments regarding procedural aspects of arbitration?
- Which soft law instruments are applicable in investment arbitration: what makes them special and important?
Other events
Thank you, your data is accepted!